Download our Free eBook Now!

Download our Free eBook Now!

Group 360 Assessments Are What We Do Best

Group 360 Assessments Are
What We Do Best

Origin recently conducted a 360 assessment of 13,541 managers
globally and across all levels within the client organisation issuing
11,893 individual feedback reports. By adopting our professionally
managed phased-approach all this was achieved in as little
as 2 months!
Click here to see how we can do the same for you.

Large-scale Online 360 Assessments

Large-scale 360 Assessments

“from the planning phase, through to the execution system,
and technical support, you have once again enabled
us to facilitate the process within the group, with confidence.
Of special note is your willingness to accommodate certain
special requests and deviations from the status quo.”
Nadine Fedeli -- Manager HR: PSS Talent Management
OD & Change Sasol Shared Services Sasolburg.
We can do the same for you. Click here.

Our Clients

Our Clients

Origin is the measurement solutions provider to some of South Africa’s most prestigious and successful organizations. Click here to see our client list.

Get In Touch With Origin

Get In Touch With Origin

Origin measures what matters most -
People, Performance, and Perceptions.
To get in touch with us click here now.

Slider
Why Choose Origin?

Why Choose Origin?


We do the work. This frees up your resources to focus on daily tasks. Our dedicated team of young professionals have the know-how and experience to get a quality job done each and every time.

Read More

360 Assessments

360 Assessments


What we do best. Origin has developed a proven, unique methodology for running 360 assessments.

Read More

Get To Know Us

Get To Know Us


Origin is young and ambitious. The business has evolved over a period of some 15 years. We are now clearly focused on becoming the best measurement solutions provider in the enterprise feedback arena.

Read More

What We Can Do For You

What We Can Do For You


Take the weight off your shoulders. All we need is a clear understanding of your measurement objectives and a list of people participating.

Read More

19 Antiquated Employee Engagement Approaches Contributing to Organizational Anxiety

Posted on: September 3rd, 2013 by Liesel Burrows

Marshall McLuhan, the Canadian philosopher of communication theory who passed away 33 years ago, once stated: “Our Age of Anxiety is, in great part, the result of trying to do today’s job with yesterday’s tools and yesterday’s concepts.”  I have been thinking about that quotation in relationship to employee engagement. The Canadian penny is a currency of yesterday and is no longer being produced but I thought it fit here to offer my “two cents worth” on outdated engagement tools and concepts.

220px-Canadian_Penny_-_Obverse 220px-Canadian_Penny_-_Reverse

Here are 19 antiquated employee engagement tools and concepts:

  1. Viewing engagement as something that is broken in need of fixing while failing to ensure that employee engagement benefits everyone.
  2. Using command and control to “get” engagement.
  3. Believing that we need a large scale program to move the dial on engagement.
  4. Using arcane surveys with untenable time gaps between measurement and communication of results.
  5. Thinking we can get a reliable and valid measure of engagement with a once a year or biannual measurement.
  6. Having senior management “retreat” to craft or develop organizational strategy.
  7. Telling rather than listening and not fully amplifying employee voice.
  8. Conceiving of employee disengagement as a punishable offence.
  9. Defining engagement as discretionary effort while failing to acknowledge all employee effort is discretionary.
  10. Squandering organizational resources on measurement to discover that engagement resembles a typical bell curve from very disengaged to very engaged.
  11. Giving vital organizational data away to large consultancies rather than using that data as the lifeblood and vibrant source of energy for the organization.
  12. Believing that we can ask people to do more and more without stopping other things.
  13. Failing to use mobile devices as an engagement tool.
  14. Treating engagement as another fad or bandwagon that we must jump on, giving it token efforts, and abandoning it just as quickly for the next fad.
  15. Attaching the word engagement too tightly to employee.
  16. Using anonymous approaches to increase engagement.
  17. Failing to weave performance into the way we approach and work with engagement.
  18. Perceiving engagement as a pizza party, a YouTube video, or a drink after work.
  19. Failing to provide needed education and training for people to act different with engaging approaches to work.

A score of nineteen is an impossible score in the game of Cribbage. Are we making employee engagement impossible with a reliance on the above 19 antiquated tools and concepts? Do theses old tools and concepts make you anxious about the future of engagement or our organizations? What other antiquated tools or concepts would you add?

 

Article courtesy of Zinger Associates

Comments are closed.

css.php